We are not going to "win" in the sense that you seem to be indicating. That
is not our mission. Our mission is to help the Iraqi government provide
security and re-build infrastructure, hunt down Al Qaeda and Baathist
dead-enders, and curtail sectarian violence. Ultimately, our mission is to
help the Iraqis reach a political settlement among the Shiites, Sunnis, and
Kurds that leads to a unified nation that can defend its own borders and
provide security for its people.

The reason we see all the talk about benchmarks for the Iraqis is that lots
of folks don't think the Iraqis are up to the job, and they want the US to
bail out if the Iraqis can't get their act together. That isn't a realistic
option. We need to keep at it with the Iraqis until they can figure out how
to reach a political settlement. It will not take forever, and we will not
be there forever. By all appearances, it could take several more years due
to the total lack of commitment by the government to getting any
constitutional reform done. The downside of the lack of progress for us is
that we continue to lose soldiers and spend billions of dollars. As great a
price in blood and treasure as we are paying, the downside for Iraqis is far
greater. Iraqi citizens are losing their lives by the hundreds every week in
sectarian killings and terrorist bombings. None of that will change until
they reach a political settlement, and at this point we have to stick it out
and push them toward a settlement or be prepared for the entire region to
descend into war. Our best option today is to help get the Iraqis to a
political settlement, get everyone on board supporting the government, and
get the government behind the idea of treating everyone equally, whether
they were a Baathist or not. Maybe they can have a South Africa style Truth
commission. Whatever they do, they all have to be on board. Once that
happens, we can start to leave, because our primary mission will have been
finished.

We might still have people there for years doing various things, just like
we have people all around the world, but nothing like the footprint we have
today.

On 5/8/07, Rick wrote:
>
> On 5/8/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > We have a mess, a huge mess.  But leaving could leave an even worse
> > mess.
>
> so what, do we just stay there, in a country that doesn't really want
> us, that we *CANNOT* control without a troop buildup of massive
> proportions.
>
> We're not going "win" this "war" with 125,000 or 200,000 troops.
> We're certainly not going to do it at those levels without
> international support.
>
> It is a gigantic mess that I don't see improving.  Ever.  We'll be
> stuck there forever, and in the end, more americans will die because
> of our presense in Iraq than would have otherwise.
>
> What's the death count to now, just in americans.  How about the death
> count of innocent Iraqi's?
>
> We win this "war" with 500,000 troops, or not at all.
>
> Maybe I'm the democratic base.  I'm usually not, but I simply don't
> see how any good will come of our continued occupation of Iraq.
>
> We need to either re-instute the MILITARY DRAFT, or get the frak out.
>
> Rick
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2 
Build sales & marketing dashboard RIA’s for your business. Upgrade now
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2?sdid=RVJT

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:234171
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to