> Here's the latest monster pig story: > > http://news.yahoo. com/s/ap/200> 70526/ap_on_fe_st/odd_monster_pig_8;_ylt=Ao9NftcykpctKoLebXOrGy9saMYA > > What's the point again of getting a thrill from the chasing, > torturing, and killing of an animal? Isn't that kind of twisted? > > I'm not a vegetarian, and I do think there needs to "culling" due to > overpopulation, etc. > > But isn't prolonging the death of a wounded animal for 3 hours for a > thrill medievally demented? What's the difference between that and > torturing puppies?
Only 3 hours? I've had to track a deer for more than that after I've shot it. NO matter what you think about hunting, once you've shot the animal, its your responsibility to make sure that it doesn't suffer. By leaving the animal wounded, you're ensuring that it suffers a painful and ugly death. Its more merciful to put it out of its misery than to let it die from its wounds. I've seen Inuit and Dene track wounded animals for days rather than let the animals suffer from its wounds. I could not do differently. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2 Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:235681 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
