Interesting... Work has us reading John Deming. He advocates that we either elect people for life or go with one term.
On 7/9/07, Heald, Timothy (NIH/CIT) [C] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An excellent argument for term limits if you ask me. > > As far as I am concerned you should get one term at each level. No more > or less. > > > -- > Timothy J. Heald | NIH-Contractor | iGate > Enterprise Business Intelligence Branch (EBIB) > Division of Enterprise and Custom Applications, CIT/NIH/DHHS > Office: 301.594.5611 | Fax: 301.443.7010 | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 1:15 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Bush, the new Teflon Don! :) > > > > unless there is something in the definition of standing... > > the thing that concerns me about the legislative brance is > > that they face election so often they are vulnerable to > > despots who wave a flag and accuse other people of lack of > > patriotism or not supporting the troops. > > > > Don't know the answer > > > > On 7/9/07, Heald, Timothy (NIH/CIT) [C] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Absolutely, but not one that the judiciary can easily rectify, it's > > > really going to take attention from the legislature to make any > > > difference here. > > > > > > -- > > > Timothy J. Heald | NIH-Contractor | iGate Enterprise Business > > > Intelligence Branch (EBIB) Division of Enterprise and Custom > > > Applications, CIT/NIH/DHHS > > > Office: 301.594.5611 | Fax: 301.443.7010 | Email: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 4:45 PM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: Re: Bush, the new Teflon Don! :) > > > > > > > > seriously, Tim, if you or I were being wiretapped -- > > would we know? > > > > If I apply to work at Sandia Labs tomorrow (which I wouldn't, but > > > > suppose) and I just don't get the job, would I ever know > > that it was > > > > because someone I have spoken to on the phone said hi to an IRA > > > > member in a pub? > > > > > > > > (Note to Big Brother: This is speculation mind you, but I > > understand > > > > it's hard to spend any time in Belfast at all before you > > speak to a > > > > member of the IRA, whether you know it or not) > > > > > > > > I understand what standing is and legally you are > > absolutely right. > > > > From the point of view of public policy, there's a real > > issue here. > > > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > > On 7/6/07, Heald, Timothy (NIH/CIT) [C] > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I don't like using intelligence services against US > > > > citizens. I think > > > > > that the legislature needs to get it's act together once GW > > > > is out and > > > > > make sure they patch any holes in the laws about > > > > wiretapping, however, > > > > > if the parties involved cannot prove that they have been > > > > impacted by > > > > > the wire tapping program then they have no legal grounds to > > > > bring a case. > > > > > That's the law. > > > > > > > > > > Now we need to find some Americans that have proof that > > the wire > > > > > tapping program was used against them to reinstate the case. > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Dinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 2:55 PM > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > Subject: Re: Bush, the new Teflon Don! :) > > > > > > > > > > > > NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! > > > > > > > > > > > > Freaking BS, man. Bull-shit. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/6/07, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN0642400020070706 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Court dismisses lawsuit on spying program > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "CINCINNATI (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court ruled on > > > > > > Friday a lawsuit > > > > > > > challenging the domestic spying program created by > > > > > > President George W. > > > > > > > Bush after the September 11 attacks must be dismissed, in a > > > > > > decision > > > > > > > based on narrow technical grounds. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The appeals court panel ruled by a 2-1 vote that the groups > > > > > > > and individuals who brought the lawsuit, led by the > > American > > > > > > > Civil Liberties Union, did not have the legal right > > to bring > > > > > > > the > > > > > > challenge > > > > > > > in the first place." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:237954 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
