I don't understand your point so I'm bailing :)

On 8/19/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > I didn't read it as Canada's system failed.
>
> The entire argument is convoluted logic and meaningless for 2 reasons:
>
> (1.) There will be a limited number of machines no matter the system
> or country.  Why?  Because who's going to fund 10,000 cardiac machines
> if the mean use is 3 per year?
>
> (2.) If America didn't exist, then Canada would have to plug the
> coverage hole, but it does so why should they?  That's like saying
> that the convenience store concept has failed because you can find a
> larger selection at a grocery store.
>
> As for surgeries in India, it ain't just going to be elective
> surgeries.  It's going to open-heart surgery, whatever.
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Check out the new features and enhancements in the
latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:240741
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to