It's lose-lose really. I mean, plead guilty, pay your fine, and hope that the general public doesn't find out, go on with your life. Plead innocent, go to court, it becomes a whole media circus, and we sit here and dissect foot movements in bathroom stalls for 45 days. And then the Senator's name gets dragged down in the mud, even if he is found innocent.
I'd choose the first one too, I guess. On 8/28/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Deanna wrote: > > It seems weak to me. I mean, sure, if you happen to be into bathroom > > sex, it probably means something to you. > > If the dude knows all the signals and then pleads guilty, he was > probably guilty. That's for a normal guy. But for a law maker to > plead guilty, a senator, a senator who denounced this very type of > behavior ... well ... I'm guessing he was pretty guilty. > > Why is it always those that claim the highest moral ground are always > in lowest possible valley? > > They vilify people who are LIKE THEM! > > Isn't this the definition of a closet liberal? "I want to behave > liberally, but I don't want others to, and I will hypocritically > condemn them for it." > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get involved in the latest ColdFusion discussions, product development sharing, and articles on the Adobe Labs wiki. http://labs/adobe.com/wiki/index.php/ColdFusion_8 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:241456 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
