The problem with "clean sweeps", is that they're not really that good for anyone.
The entire system is geared towards checks and balances- I don't know why anyone would want their party to be in total control. We've been shown how that type of responsibility corrupts. That's why we don't need any more than two parties. A No Confidence vote would be a nice addition, but I've had enough of the "single mind" mindset. It's better when compromise is needed, IMO. On 9/27/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The major Democratic Presidential candidates have refused to back complete > troop withdrawl from Iraq by 2013. > > http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070927/D8RTI22O0.html > > Now, if the Democrats in Congress would just get with the program and follow > my prescription for them to take the lead in solving the Iraqi political > reconciliation mess, they would have a clean sweep of Congress and the > Presidency in 2008. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Check out the new features and enhancements in the latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:243463 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
