He either misunderstood what you wrote, misread what you wrote, or is just nit-picking over the wording of "the government had to BORROW to pay for them."
I'm thinking it's a combination of all 3 >=-) Todd ----- Original Message ----- From: "Braver, Ben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:20 PM Subject: RE: Nukes > Michael- > I'm tired of your put-downs. > You obviously have an agenda. > It doesn't apparently include common courtesy. > I'm not going to respond to you any more. > -Ben > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Corrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:21 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Nukes > > > > > > Then how in the world can you possibly say that we had to pay > > for tax cuts?! That's a ridiculous assertion and one that > > gets bantered around without anyone ever challenging it or > > giving it a second thought. We pay for things that the > > government spends money on not on money that they don't receive. > > > > Michael Corrigan ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
