> RoMunn wrote: > The word is isolationist, not conservative. Under your test, Clinton and > Bush are both foreign policy liberals, but their policies are clearly very, > very different. Does the label even mean anything, then? Doesn't look like > it. >
Clinton would be a FP moderate-liberal since he believed in engaging with other countries, but only militarily via the UN. Bush would be a FP radical since he preemptively attacked another country which, as it turns out, was without provocation. So, yes, the label does mean everything if you use it correctly. It's been over a decade since I had PoliSci, but I'm pretty sure it's the accepted term. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get the answers you are looking for on the ColdFusion Labs Forum direct from active programmers and developers. http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid-72&catid=648 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:244504 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
