> Chesty wrote: > I'm not looking to vilify any race out there... just suggesting the > eminently logical. There *are* known differences between races.
Which is why I find the whole argument against *the possibility* such an affront to logic: If there weren't any differences, there wouldn't be races! The fact is, we do define races and we *may* be able to find intelligence differences between them. And that's a COMPLETELY different point than how we might define both intelligence AND the differences. I still think intelligence is, intuitively, capacity to learn and speed of learning. For example, take a kid who starts talking at 6 months old and can extrapolate multiplication tables at 1: wouldn't we define that child as exceptional? One what basis? The speed of learning. Of course we differentiate intelligence types such as common sense, emotional IQ, etc. But our economy rewards people who are academically talented and thus that's the general basis for saying someone is intelligent. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion is delivering applications solutions at at top companies around the world in government. Find out how and where now http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=finder&productID=1522&loc=en_us Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:245439 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
