My opinion still stands as the original post 'glossed over' the important parts 
of the case, which is standard for such conspiracy sites/writers. This was not 
a plot by the MIC but a criminal case involving foreign agents. Business as 
usual was not to sell the parts to enemy nations but to follow standard 
procedures for sales. Unfortunately, the government agencies were stupid, not 
malicious. 

Take an article, skip over the parts you don't like, push forward the parts 
that fit your mind set, make it part of a conspiracy, and boom - this article. 

And he didn't quote the Washington Post articles as they stated the events 
quite clearly. He made up a claim from Janes because it fit the tone he was 
trying to set. 

Lies, damn lies, internet conspiracy sites. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Check out the new features and enhancements in the
latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:247700
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to