Yes, a source that he does not mention because it gives the article a totally different spin. Reading the Washington Post article shows clearly that this is a criminal matter with lack of review on the governments part. No plot, no conspiracy, no MIC (and no Janes link yet).
Yes, we've sold to Iraq in the past but this is not us selling to Iran now. Not directly and not knowingly. There wasn't an Iranian stepping up saying "I'm from Iran, sell me the parts". There wasn't a government official or anyone from the MIC saying "I'm selling these parts to our enemy". On Dec 9, 2007 8:46 AM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well not to be technical but it does have sources. Jane's has a pretty > good reputation. II haven't looked into it beyond that, and don't have > time right now. But would it surprise me, no. We've sold Iran weapons > in the past. > > -- Michael Dinowitz (http://www.linkedin.com/in/mdinowitz) President: House of Fusion (http://www.houseoffusion.com) Publisher: Fusion Authority (http://www.fusionauthority.com) Adobe Community Expert / Advanced Certified ColdFusion Professional ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get involved in the latest ColdFusion discussions, product development sharing, and articles on the Adobe Labs wiki. http://labs/adobe.com/wiki/index.php/ColdFusion_8 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:248005 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
