Hope the oil money and party contributions from the Energy Sector is
all worth it in 50 years.

I guess the billionairres will be able to carve out their little bits
of heaven even if the rest of the
world is going to pot, though.

Maybe they will all just fly to the moon.

"Do not be downhearted about the outcome of the Bali talks. They did
not deliver the binding commitments to cuts in greenhouse gas
emissions that are desperately needed, and as a result millions may
die who might have lived. But they did show us something remarkable.
They showed us the human race trying to grow up and take
responsibility for its common future.

It doesn't feel like that, of course. It feels like 15,000
politicians, diplomats, journalists and activists flew across
continents in order to sit in Bali for two weeks and achieve very
little. Disappointment and even anger are not out of order, for the
commitment to early and deep emission cuts (25 to 40 per cent by 2020)
that most developed countries wanted to see in the draft treaty had to
be dropped in order to keep the United States involved at all.

The Bush administration no longer denies that climate change is a
problem, but it is still determined to kill any international deal
that involves concrete and legally binding targets. The United States
produces about a quarter of the world's emissions, so no deal that
excludes it would work. Moreover, the developing countries where
emissions are growing fastest, particularly China and India, will
never accept obligations of their own while the United States accepts
none. So the American delegation had to be kept on board no matter how
obstructive it was.

It was amazingly obstructive. There must be no targets, there must be
no timetables, there must be no numbers at all in the "roadmap'' that
the conference was drawing up for the next two years of negotiations
on a successor to the Kyoto treaty, insisted chief US negotiator
Harlan Watson.

Why not? Because "once numbers appear in the text, it prejudges the
outcome and will tend to drive the negotiations in one direction.''
Yes, and if everybody's shared goal is cut emissions and avoid
catastrophic climate change, what's wrong with that?

The United States was almost completely isolated at the Bali talks.

Its only two allies among the developed countries were Canada and
Japan, both of which promised modest emission cuts under the Kyoto
accord ten years ago but then allowed their emissions to soar. And the
danger was that the frustration and fury of all the other delegations,
in the hothouse atmosphere of a two-week conference, would lure them
into a pointless and destructive confrontation with the United States.

It was Al Gore who saved the day with a speech in which he urged the
conference to be patient. "My own country, the United States, is
mainly responsible for obstructing progress at Bali,'' he admitted,
but "over the next two years the United States is going to be
somewhere it is not now....One year and 40 days from today there will
be a new (presidential) inauguration in the United States.''

"If you decide to continue the progress that has been made here on all
the items other than the targets and timetables for mandatory
reductions, on the hope and with the expectation that, before this
process is concluded...you will be able to fill in that blank (with
the help of a different position from the United States), then you can
make great progress here.'' Bush will soon be gone. Even though time
is short, you have to wait him out.

The conference took Gore's advice and removed the numbers from the
text. Even then, astonishingly, the US delegation declared that it
could not support the revised text - and a chorus of boos rang out in
the crowded conference hall. A delegate from Papua New Guinea stood up
and told the US delegation: "If you're not willing to lead, please get
out of the way.'' After a short huddle, the US delegation announced
that it would support the revised text after all.

So don't believe the cynics who say that public opinion does not
matter. A large majority of Americans are far ahead of their
government in their desire to see effective action on climate change,
and the Bush administration is fighting a delaying action. With both
world opinion and American public opinion solidly against it, it
suddenly became clear to the US delegation that this line of trenches
had to be abandoned fast.

So there is a "roadmap'' for the next two years of negotiations,
although it has no hard numbers in it. Low-level meetings will
continue over the next year, but the next big conference, scheduled
for Poland next December, will probably be allowed to slip by a couple
of months so that the new US administration is in office. And then,
hopefully, they can put the numbers back in.

There is no guarantee that the emissions cuts they finally agree in
2009 will be big enough, or that everybody will meet their
commitments.

Runaway global warming is a serious possibility, in which case we may
be facing megadeaths by mid-century. But Bali was not a futile or a
shameful exercise. It was six billion people in 180 separate countries
trying to cope with a shared danger in a cooperative way. It was
actually quite inspiring, and even 50 years ago it would have been
inconceivable.

Gwynne Dyer is a London-based
independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:248480
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to