If (oil >= 100) then shailcost=17+23 /*17 operational cost, 23 environmental recovery cost*/
What's better? $40 dollars used inside America or $100+ going to countries who support terrorism overtly or covertly. On Dec 27, 2007 6:18 PM, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >If the initial test showed a result of $17 per barrel then at current > prices > >I'd say there's enough room to tack on a fee to repair or restrict damage > to > >the environment. > > > > $17 seems much too optimistic. And that doesn't include environmental > recovery costs. Also if you look at the areas where the oil shale is, its > among the more ecologically sensitive areas in the west. > > but hey who cares about the environment when oil is involved. Slash and > burn! > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:249219 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
