yes, and the object of moving AMT to corporate taxes is to keep Washington from legislating away the taxes of campaign contributors. If fairtax would end the practice that is a point in its favor.
On 2/6/08, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dana wrote: > > Your second point is mistaken though, as corporate welfare is > > currently not spread evenly across the business spectrum. It tends to > > flow primarily to campaign contributors. If those corporations lose > > their tax break and have to increase the price of their goods, then > > people will buy those goods if they are worh buying and won't if they > > are not. Which is as it should be. Am I really arguing this point with > > somoene who claims to be a fiscal conservative? > > > > Actually, ending corporate tax breaks is also part of Fairtax. I was > looking for alternatives... And besides you weren't suggesting this > initially, you were suggesting moving AMT to the corporate world. you > are really avoiding the questions here. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253581 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
