No, I was pointing out that you were complaining that an enterprise application server that costs lots of money doesn't follow the same business rules as open source software, and that you seem surprised by that fact.
Is there any for-pay software on earth that follows the same business rules as a comperably open source version? On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > as far as I know, it's not open sourced yet? Am I missing something? > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So you are saying that cf isn't open source? > > > > Uh, duh? > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I've been down that road before. I had a server that ran the latest > > > version > > > of BD that was available to run free as a server. It was a pain > finding > > > out > > > that things didn't necessarily run the same way on BD as it did on CF. > > > Plus > > > were already invested in CF licenses. > > > > > > As for a bogus reason...well, with Ruby/Rails, or any other open > source > > > language, I can set up the same environments on testing, staging and > > > production without worrying about licensing. I don't have to worry > > about > > > a > > > devnet version putting up a meta tag stating it's the devnet version > and > > > killing all the ajax/xml calls. I don't have to worry about only two > > > coworkers being able to see the site. > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:257806 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
