> I agree, but he said a "good programmer", not a good PM, or even a good FB > programmer.
Bad choice of words, agreed. > Besides, after they showed CFC's off at the Devcon, I immediately knew FB > was dead. Until CFC's FB may have been necessary for those who wanted a > methodology, but not any more. Now we can do OO CF... CFC's? Well, that's the thing .. FB is evolving in to a Software Development Lifecycle Process and away from just something that tries to mimic OO programming. That's where I think its real strength lies. Todd > > jon > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:52 PM > Subject: Re: Conversations... > > > > You are looking at this from the side of someone who would get handed a > > fusedoced fuse snippit to write. What they are talking about is more from > > the point of view of the PM. What they will be eventually getting to is > the > > whole point of FLiP .. distributed application development. Like Hal > > mentioned in this mopnth's edition of CFDJ, if you are doing a small to > med. > > project by yourself, then the only benifit you are likely to see is well > > structured code with fewer revisions, which you could probably give or > take. > > Hal and Steve's conversations are starting to gravitate more to large > scale > > projects being built in a team environment. > > > > I used to resist FB as well. Then I finaly started using it and now I > can't > > stand any other way. I would have imagined that a clear structured > > methodology would appeal to a left brained person, would it not? > > > > Todd ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
