It's not a retention device Sam, it's not supposed to be one, it's 
supposed to be for service rendered.

sam morris wrote:
> The White House comes out swinging against the NYT:
> http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/05/26/nyt-bashes-bush-memorial-day-white-house-strikes-back
> or 
> http://tinyurl.com/6ozyfo
> 
>      Once again, the New York Times Editorial Board doesn't let the facts get 
> in the way of expressing its vitriolic opinions - no matter how misleading 
> they may be.
> 
>     In today's editorial, "Mr. Bush and the GI Bill", the New York Times 
> irresponsibly distorts President Bush's strong commitment to strengthening 
> and expanding support for America's service members and their families.
> 
>     This editorial could not be farther from the truth about the President's 
> record of leadership on this issue. In his January 2008 State of the Union 
> Address, while proposing a series of initiatives to support our military 
> families, President Bush specifically called upon Congress to answer service 
> members' request that they be able to transfer their GI Bill benefits to 
> their spouses and children. In April, he sent a legislative package to the 
> Hill that would expand access to childcare, create new authorities to appoint 
> qualified spouses into civil service jobs, provide education opportunities 
> and job training for military spouses, and allow our troops to transfer their 
> unused education benefits to their spouses or children.
> 
>     As Congress debates the best way to expand the existing GI Bill, 
> Secretary Gates has laid out important guidelines to ensure that legislation 
> meets our service members' needs and rewards military service. First, since 
> our servicemen and women have regularly requested the ability to transfer 
> their GI bill benefits to their family members, legislation should include 
> transferability. Second, legislation should provide greater rewards for 
> continued military service in the all volunteer force.
> 
>     There are several GI bill proposals under consideration in both the House 
> and Senate. The Department of Defense has specific concerns about legislation 
> sponsored by Senator Webb because it lacks transferability and could 
> negatively impact military retention.
> 
>     The President specifically supports the GI Bill legislation expansion 
> proposed by Senators Graham, Burr, and McCain because it allows for the 
> transferability of education benefits and calibrates an increase in education 
> benefits to time in the service.
> 
>     Though readers of the New York Times editorial page wouldn't know it, 
> President Bush looks forward to signing a GI bill that supports our troops 
> and their families, and preserves the experience and skill of our forces. 
>> I guess this just reminds me of the baffling nature of "patriotism"
>> when it comes to the military.
>>
>> We've got a president that for 8 years has, in words, praised
>> servicepersons but in action fucked them over at ever turn.
>> Blatently.
>>
>> Yet for some reason, most servicepeople seem to like the guy - or are
>> loyal to him.  And it just never ceases to amaze me.  Here are the
>> facts:
>>
>> 1.) Bush sends troops to an ill-thought out war, with no definition of
>> success, and therefore no plan for it.  Basically a never ending meat
>> grinder where the greatest hope of common grunt is to not get killed.
>>
>> 2.) He purposely sends too few troops to do what ill-defined missions
>> he sends them on.
>>
>> 3.) He doesn't give them the equipment they need and fight efforts to do so.
>>
>> 4.) He allows and defends shoddy treatments of combat wounded vets.
>>
>> 5.) He openly rejects more benefits for these same troops implying
>> that if he gives them benefits they won't fight in his poorly planned
>> war.
>>
>> How do we bottle this product the Bush is selling and people are buying?
>>
>> Cause it seems to me that in any other circumstances people would
>> laugh this guy out on his ass after an hour (at the most) yet here he
>> is after 8 years with plenty of military support. 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:260796
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to