You did read this sentence: "While the report presents synopses of the detainees' backgrounds based on interviews with them, the authors did not have access to the detainees' medical histories. Therefore, there's no way to know whether any of the inmates may have had medical or mental problems before being detained."
This means that they also had no way of verifying if any of these findings were pre existing prior to detention at Gitmo. If the current administration (and/or those directly responsible) can be proven culpable then by all means prosecute them, but one study doth not a strong case make. Until then we have to assume that any human rights group has a "anti-us bias" and their results will be skewed in that direction I'd like to see the UN or the Hague do the same independant investigation and see what they come up with. -------------- Original message from Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -------------- > http://edition.cnn.com/2008/US/06/18/gitmo.detainees/index.html?iref=mpstoryview > > > Well, tortured according to a medical definition at least. > We know that detainees are actually guilty sub-humans and don't > deserve any human rights. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:262182 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
