On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > actually I just clicked on the last message I read in the thread, so I don't > mean you specifically. I am glad you are against all subsidies -- this is at > least a rational position and one I might consider. > > I do think you are missing *my* point -- you don't get charged with fraud > because your clients can't do math.
Well, if there was a crime involved, the company or individual should be held accountable *in a courtroom*. No bailouts. Crime should be resolved through the court system. If a company goes under because they issued too many bad loans, that's their problem. That's the free market, and the govt shouldn't be bailing them out either. The only way the market really works is if you let it work. I also think that while there may have been some cases where people were taken advantage and lied to, the overwhelming majority of cases were just people who saw a deal too good to be true and took it. -Cameron ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:262800 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
