It would actually be easier in the case of the car to prosecute, as you do not have the right to own one, drive one, register one.
To be honest, I don't think you should be held accountable for the others actions in any of the cases mentioned so far. You didn't make them break into your home or car and steal it. The Heller vs. DC decision specifically makes trigger lock and disassembly requirements unconstitutional, so theres no way around that. G Money wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> But to Jerry's point, and your point about heaps of responsibility, >> there should be a degree of responsibility placed on the individual >> because (again, to your point), a gun is not a car. If I legally own >> a gun, but leave visible on the seat of my car (windows down) while I >> go into the convenience store... I can definitely see negligibility on >> my part. > > > Me too. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:262860 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
