Don't get me wrong -- if it's true then I deplore it. If I understand
the allegation, they are reporting real blogs with real opinion as
spam. See, this is not free and open debate, it's Nixonian dirty
tricks. If it's true, and I have not even read the article to see
whether I think it is.

However.

Bad behavior but individuals is not in the same category as
suppression of free speech by the government. I know you're saying
it's apples and oranges too, but I don't think you understand my
point. I am outraged-out.

I'm much more worried about people getting fired for doing their job
not parroting the party line, which has happened a lot, or being
locked up indefinitely, which has also happened a lot, or being lied
to by their government, which has happened a whole hell of a lot.


On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:09 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Learn something new every day!
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zones
>
> I'm glad that both parties are equally hypocritical in the use of
> these things.  It takes a pretty haughty view of the 1st Amendment to
> say, "you can exercise your freedom of speech and public assembly...
> over... there."  That is my read on what the "Free Speech Zones" are.
>
> However you're comparing apples and oranges.
>
> The Free Speech Zones were/are a calculated attempt to "corral"
> protesters so the media could ignore them.  My thought is that this is
> also the organizer's attempt to protect their own freedom of assembly
> and speech, since most protesters these days seem to equate freedom of
> speech with freedom to disrupt.  Before you say it, I know about the
> grannies that were arrested for holding a sign outside the zone.
> Those are outside the scope of my assumptions.
>
> What the Obama supporters are doing is more akin to disrupting and
> denying the freedom of speech of others.  They are taking calculated
> actions and falsely accusing those who hold opposite views of
> violating a services TOS.  This is the same as removing their freedom
> of speech altogether until the false accusations are cleared up.
>
> Hatton
>
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> this is of course of much more concern than "free speech zones."
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Looks to me like Obama supporters want to stifle dissent...
>>>
>>>
>>> ======
>>>
>>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=1182
>>>
>>> Yesterday, Americans celebrated Independence Day - and I got to spent too
>>> much of the day loafing around paging lazily through a whole bunch of more
>>> or less nutty political sites.
>>>
>>> One of things I noticed was the marked difference in treatment accorded a
>>> particularly nasty little controversy around whether or not google was
>>> purposely shutting down anti-Obama sites on its blogger.com network.
>>>
>>> Here's the salient bit from what appears to have been the first blast of the
>>> whistle - by Warner
>>> Huston<http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/06/29/google-shuts-down-anti-obama-sites-on-its-blogger-platform>
>>>
>>> It looks like Google has officially joined the Barack Obama campaign and
>>> decided that its contribution would be to shut down any blog on the Google
>>> owned Blogspot.com blogging system that has an anti-Obama message. Yes, it
>>> sure seems that Google has begun to go through its many thousands of blogs
>>> to lock out the owners of anti-Obama blogs so that the noObama message is
>>> effectively squelched.
>>>
>>>  A bit after writing this he added this update above his original story:
>>>
>>> Update: Perhaps it isn't google, but Obamaniacs taking advantage of google's
>>> faulty sytem. A commenter explains:
>>>
>>> The problem with blogger is that a group of people with an ax to grind can
>>> report any blog as spam and after enough complaints, it's automatically
>>> suspended until a real live human being can get around to examining it. If
>>> enough complaints are registered with blogger, you might get a response
>>> within 5 days but it takes a concerted effort. This is a huge problem with
>>> blogger and something google needs to get a handle on.
>>>
>>>  Regardless who is at fault, this shutting down of free speech is
>>> disturbing.
>>>
>>>  As it turns out the person who wrote the comment appears to have been
>>> correct: blogger.com, and many of its righter users, seem to have been the
>>> victims of a co-ordinated attempt to silence perceived opponents.
>>>
>>> At the personal level the resemblence to groklaw's policy of presuring
>>> editors to shut up writers critizing them struck me as "a
>>> birds-of-a-feather" problem, but what was actually most interesting about
>>> the whole mess was that it produced an uproar in the right wing blogosphere
>>> but went largely unmentioned, and certainly uncondemned, in the much more
>>> populous liberal blogosphere.
>>>
>>> The story made headlines, for example, at
>>> hotair<http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/30/now-just-imagine-blogger-was-the-fec>but
>>> appears
>>> to have gone 
>>> unmentioned<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=blogspot+google+shutdown+anti-obama+sites++%28site:huffingtonpost.com+OR+site:moveon.org+OR+site:dailykos.com%29&start=30&sa=N>on
>>> dailykos, the huffingtonpost, and
>>> moveon.org.
>>>
>>> The specific issue is unimportant to most technology managers, but in more
>>> general terms this is a problem affecting all of cloud computing: trust your
>>> business to an Amazon, a Microsoft, or a Google, and you become vulnerable
>>> to a wholly new kind of denial of service attack - one that can be triggered
>>> by essentially unrelated employee actions or opinions and hold your entire
>>> business hostage to the service provider's business processes.
>>>
>>> "Five days" with "a concerted effort" is the guy's description of google's
>>> remediation process - and if you don't think a business contract on
>>> something like email will ever be treated the same way: think about your
>>> business relationship with monopoly suppliers from telcos to Microsoft.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:263408
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to