This just in:

Leaks in Patch for Web Security Hole
Sign In to E-Mail or Save This
Print
Reprints
Share
Linkedin
Digg
Facebook
Mixx
Yahoo! Buzz
Permalink


By JOHN MARKOFF
Published: August 8, 2008
SAN FRANCISCO — Faced with the discovery of a serious flaw in the
Internet's workings, computer network administrators around the world
have been rushing to fix their systems with a cobbled-together patch.
Now it appears that the patch has some gaping holes.

Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image

Jae C. Hong/Associated Press
The crowd at a speech given by Dan Kaminsky, a researcher at a
security firm who has been vocal about an Internet vulnerability.

Related
With Security at Risk, a Push to Patch the Web (July 30, 2008)
Enlarge This Image

Jae C. Hong/Associated Press
Mr. Kaminsky, at a conference in Las Vegas, said the flaw could affect
not just the Web but also other services like e-mail.
On Friday, a Russian physicist demonstrated that the emergency fix to
the basic Internet address system, known as the Domain Name System, is
vulnerable and will almost certainly be exploited by criminals.

The flaw could allow Internet traffic to be secretly redirected so
thieves could, for example, hijack a bank's Web address and collect
customer passwords.

In a posting on his blog, the physicist, Evgeniy Polyakov, wrote that
he had fooled the software that serves as the Internet's telephone
book into returning an incorrect address in just 10 hours, using two
standard desktop computers and a high-speed network link. Internet
experts who reviewed the posting said the approach appeared to be
effective.

The basic vulnerability of the network has become a heated controversy
since Dan Kaminsky, a Seattle-based researcher at the security firm
IOActive, quietly notified a number of companies that distribute
Internet addressing software earlier this year.

On Wednesday, Mr. Kaminsky described the vulnerability to a packed
room at a technical conference in Las Vegas. He said that it could
affect not just the Web but also other services like e-mail.

The general risk of such a flaw had been known for some years within
the insular Internet technical community. But in the last month
security engineers have repeatedly stated that it is only a matter of
time before financial organizations and others are attacked by
computer criminals seeking to exploit the now-public flaw. One expert
says this is happening now.

"We have already been seeing attacks in the wild for the past two
weeks," said Bill Woodcock, research director of the Packet Clearing
House, a nonprofit technical organization. Some of the initial attacks
focused on distributing malicious software, he said, and more recently
there has been evidence of so-called phishing attacks aimed at
stealing personal information.

It is now almost certain that there will be an escalating number of
attacks, Mr. Woodcock said. Before the patch, which has now been
distributed to more than three-quarters of the affected servers in the
world, it would have taken as little as one second to insert false
information into the address database. Now, even with the patch,
attacks will be possible in a matter of minutes or hours, he said.

Mr. Polyakov carried out his attack using two fast computers, but the
same attack could be carried out more quickly. There is now an intense
debate over how to find a more permanent fix for the system's
weaknesses.

"We've bought some time," said Paul Mockapetris, the software engineer
who devised the original D.N.S. system and is now chairman of Nominum,
a firm that makes a version of the D.N.S. software that is not
vulnerable to the current flaw. Mr. Mockapetris described the patch
that is now being put in place as the equivalent of "playing Russian
roulette with a gun that has 100 bullet chambers instead of six."

"The point," he said, "should be to take the gun out of people's hands."

The root of the problem lies in the fact that the address system,
which was invented in 1983, was not meant for services like electronic
banking that require strict verification of identity.

"They are relying on infrastructure that was not intended to do what
people assume it does," said Clifford Neuman, director of the Center
for Computer Systems Security at the University of Southern
California. "What makes this so frustrating is that no one has been
listening to what we have been saying for the past 17 years."

A number of Internet security engineers point out that if a solution
is found for the deeper problem of identity and authentication on the
Internet, it will go a long way toward stopping many of the
identity-related crimes that are now commonplace.

Some experts are proposing an encryption-based solution known as
DNSSEC. It would give Web users high confidence that the Internet
address they are being sent to is correct.

So far several governments, including Sweden and Puerto Rico, have
adopted DNSSEC, and the United States government is likely to deploy
the system for its .gov domain this year.

"DNSSEC is not an overnight solution for the Kaminsky problem, but
it's the right solution in the long run," said Richard Lamb, a
technical expert at the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers, the nonprofit organization that oversees Internet security
and stability.

Others remain skeptical that the more secure approach is practical for
the wider commercial Internet, because it requires more computing
power and because it would be hard to get the whole world to adopt it.

One technical expert, Daniel J. Bernstein, a University of Illinois
mathematician who has also developed a version of D.N.S. that does not
suffer from the current flaw, said DNSSEC "offers a surprisingly low
level of security, while at the same time introducing performance and
reliability problems."



http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/09/technology/09flaw.html?hp

On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> eh, it's a pretty serious vulnerability :)
>
> Agreed.
>
>> Network security is all about taking stuff like this seriously.
>
> Agreed.
>
> This are the times when people who cheap out get nailed.  Understaffed
> companies, or companies staffed with one armed muppets are generally
> the ones who remain vulnerable at this point.
>
> -Cameron
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:265645
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to