You completely remove the moral, the ideological from the equation by 
making it just about resources.

Gruss Gott wrote:
>> tBone wrote:
>> That wasn't quantified in the initial question, and you still haven't
>> answered my question.
>>
> 
> This is all a question of thoughtful allocation of scarce resources.
> 
> Under Mr. Bush, America squandered it's diplomatic capital in the
> world, killed off 5000 and took out of action 50,000 or our best
> troops, and left other problems - like Afghanistan, Pakistan, AQ
> leadership, Hamas, North Korea, Hezbollah, and Iran - to fester.
> 
> Basically we had a million dollars in the bank and we spent $900,000
> of it on a vintage Jag hat's taken us 5 years to get just barely
> working.
> 
> Your argument is that despite that fact that we've spent all of our
> resources on something that's of dubious usefulness, not to worry,
> because the future MAYBE will swing in our favor.  Well, maybe.
> 
> But, essentially you've traded control for much heat and no light.
> 
> I like control.  So we disagree.
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:266230
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to