Assuming all of that is true, I agree.

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>this is pretty questionable. I only got halfway through the article
>>due to time constraints but it requires parsing to decide who was
>>abusing power here. If it was Palin that would of course be wrong. If
>>the ex brother in law was in fact a violent drunk who was also a cop,
>>that is of course a problem. If all this only came out because he went
>>to a convention with another woman, it makes me question the validity
>>of the issue.
>>
>>There may well be a problem here but I do not find that it is clearcut.
>
> Frankly they're all at fault. The ex brother in law for obvious reasons. Then 
> because there was not quite enough evidence to get him out of the State 
> Police, she abuses her power as governor and tried to get him fired. When 
> that doesn't work because the Commissioner of the State Police insists on 
> following the law (big surprise there), she uses her gubernatorial power to 
> get the State Police Commisssioner fired. Now the republicans are touting her 
> as anti-corruption? Sounds like the same sort of anti-corruption attitude 
> that led to the recent DA firings. Same old, same old.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:267258
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to