Below from a friend, phrases exactly what concerns me about the Palins.

"If what I read is right -- and, of course, with all the crap out there, it 
may not be -- while Sarah Palin was living in Juneau as governor (with the 
new baby), the rest of the family remained in Wasilla. But dad Todd had a 
job that required him, too, to be absent much of the time -- one week on, 
one week off. So the kids got looked after by other family members. Unspoken 
message to kids: our jobs are more important to us than you are.

Most of the families in my circle are 2-career couples, and they have made 
various adjustments and, yes, sacrifices, especially during the vulnerable 
teen years, to try to maintain/improve/ensure the stability of the family, 
to make sure that the kids know they are loved, supported, valued, etc. They 
recognize that at least one parent (but preferably both, taking turns as 
needed) needs to be around enough to be involved in their kids' lives: 
driving them to & fro (and their friends, to be sure to know them and have 
their trust/respect, too), sitting in the stands when they compete in 
whatever activity they're involved in (and occasionally even peering above 
their laptop screen to actually catch some of the action), having meals 
together on a regular basis, and so on. This is not the stuff to be left to 
various family babysitters -- aunts, uncles, grandparents, etc. -- who, 
while they love the kids, are still just understudies. To grow up 
emotionally
healthy, kids need to know their parents love them more than anything else.

I don't know a single family that doesn't have issues & conflicts with its 
teens. (After all, it's Nature's way of easing the pain otherwise felt when 
they leave the nest!) But there are issues and there are issues. After 
spending a couple of Friday mornings observing the proceedings of our local 
county court awhile back (while awaiting the sentencing of the "friendly 
neighborhood burglar" who tried to break into our home), and seeing loser 
after loser on the docket, I quickly concluded that my kids are wonderful 
and vowed to never again criticize their socks-on-the-stairs habit! 
(Although I'm still not happy with their choice, after going off to college, 
to own a fake ID for purposes of procuring alcohol & entrance into clubs, 
though I imagine I'd have done the same!)

Sometimes, in order to put the kids' needs in the forefront, a family will 
find that one parent needs to cut back hours, or take a job that maybe pays 
less but is closer, or allows flexible time or telecommuting. Sometimes a 
parent loses a job and finds a new one clear across the country -- but to 
keep the kids in a stable environment, chooses to "commute" for a year or 
two, to let a kid finish high school and allow the spouse stay at his/her 
job. I can count at least 5 families I know that that's happened to. Others 
choose to relocate the whole family, although that's less common when 
high-school-age kids are involved. In real life, families need to weigh 
what's best for the family and make tough choices like these.

Throughout it all, if you want to raise children with self-esteem, so that 
they can start out in life setting lofty goals and believing they can 
achieve them -- and then really go out and achieve them -- your kids need to 
know you're there for them, you love them, you value their achievements, you 
think they make good decisions, you're all on the same team, etc. etc. Above 
all, they need to know they're your #1 priority.

That's not the message Sarah & Todd Palin are giving their kids. When both 
parents are physically and/or emotionally absent (and often when even just 
one is), one or more of their children is almost bound to act out -- whether 
through disciplinary problems, lousy grades, unprotected sex, drugs, petty 
crime, or whatever. It helps them test their parents' limits and love -- and 
for a kid, negative attention is better than none.

The whole issue of the new baby Trig is just another example of this 
family's not putting their children's needs first. Sarah Palin is trying to 
act like it's no big deal having a kid at all! It doesn't have to interrupt 
a thing, business as usual! Seriously, going back to work 3 days after 
giving birth??? What was she trying to prove? Who was the baby bonding with 
while she was busy playing governor? (I hope she wasn't governing AND 
getting up every 2-3 hours to feed him!) And this is a child who will need 
extensive interventions in his early months and years. She'd be a lot more 
believable preaching family values if she or her husband had taken the 
maternity/paternity leave they're allowed by law.

I've never before seen a candidate's children so *not* be their parents' 
focus! Has Sarah Palin ever even said anything about wanting a better 
America for her children?? They're not in her equation at all! (Of course, 
on the other hand, we haven't heard much from her yet anyway.... maybe Weds. 
night!)

It's not a sexist-type question of woman's vs. man's roles, mom vs. dad. 
It's a question of true family values, of a person's and a couple's real 
priorities in life. These people are sacrificing their children not for the 
good of the country (really, there are other, far more qualified people who 
could have filled the VP role), but for their own egos and ambition. (Same, 
by the way, went for John Edwards, who IMHO should not have continued his 
campaign -- let alone had an affair! -- while his wife was being treated for 
breast cancer. With young kids at home and mom undergoing chemo, his family 
needed him home. Ego and ambition over family, just another example.)

So it's not the pregnancy that's the issue, it's the family dynamics. And 
for the insight they provide into the candidate's character, it's a 
legitimate issue." 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:267570
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to