On 9/2/08, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How so? > > If a potential vice presidential candidate promotes a position that clearly > flouts the constitution then it definitely IS an issue to me.
No, she was asked her personal opinion on something unrelated to the job she was seeking. There's no indication she studied it or even thought more than a minute about it. She responded with a personal off the cuff remark. How about a presidential candidate that claims to be a constitutional lawyer? "Obama believes the D.C. handgun law is constitutional." - Chicago Tribune on Nov. 20, 2007 > So far, to my knowledge, both McCain and Palin have failed to make any > definitive statement on the issue (unfortunately something I expect much, > much more of from them). They simply say "teach the controversy" which is, > in itself, an evasion and a clear indication of either willful ignorance or > willful dissembling. It has nothing to do with the job so why care? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:267641 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
