I love marine archeology. http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/09/19/ike.mystery.ship.ap/index.html
*FORT MORGAN, Alabama (AP)* -- When the waves from Hurricane Ike receded, they left behind a mystery: a ragged shipwreck that archeologists say could be a two-masted Civil War schooner that ran aground in 1862 or another ship from 70 years later. A ragged boat from 1862 or 1933 washed ashore in Fort Morgan, Alabama, after Hurricane Ike. The wreck, about 6 miles from Fort Morgan, had been partially uncovered when Hurricane Camille cleared away sand in 1969. Researchers at the time identified it as the Monticello, a battleship that partially burned when it crashed trying to get past the U.S. Navy and into Mobile Bay during the Civil War. After examining photos of the wreck post-Ike, Museum of Mobile marine archaeologist Shea McLean agreed that it is probably the Monticello, which ran aground in 1862 after sailing from Havana, Cuba, according to Navy records. iReport.com: See video of the ship from iReporter Tammy Brewer<http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-87554> "Based on what we know of ships lost in that area and what I've seen, the Monticello is by far the most likely candidate," McLean said. "You can never be 100 percent certain unless you find the bell with 'Monticello' on it, but this definitely fits." Fort Morgan was used as Union forces attacked in 1864 during the Battle of Mobile Bay. Other clues indicate that it could be an early 20th-century schooner that ran aground on the Alabama <http://topics.cnn.com/topics/Alabama/> coast in 1933. The wrecked ship is 136.9 feet long and 25 feet wide, according to Mike Bailey, site curator at Fort Morgan, who examined it this week. The Monticello was listed in shipping records as 136 feet long, McLean told the Press-Register of Mobile. But Bailey said a 2000 report by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers<http://topics.cnn.com/topics/U_S_Army_Corps_of_Engineers>determined that the remains were the schooner Rachel, built at Moss Point, Mississippi, in 1919 and wrecked near Fort Morgan in 1933. He said the wreckage appears to have components, such as steel cables, that would point to the Rachel rather than an 1860s schooner. Glenn Forest, another archaeologist who examined the wreck, said a full identification would require an excavation. "It's a valuable artifact," he said. "They need to get this thing inside before it falls apart or another storm comes along and sends it through those houses there like a bowling ball." iReport.com: See a closer look at the remains of the ship <http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-89111/> Meanwhile, curious beach-goers have been drawn to the remains of the wooden hull filled with rusted iron fittings. "It's interesting, I can tell you that," Terri Williams said. "I've lived down here most of my life, and I've never seen anything like this, and it's been right here." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:270393 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
