it may also be true that she was nervous and froze. If so I find that understandable but also not a good thing in a potential president and an indication that yes she is out of her depth. I think she knows a lot less than she thinks she does and appears to have troubel articulating the rest. It does seem odd that she would not be aware of the exxon case.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> JJ wrote: >> Palin is very versed in the affairs of Alaska, which she should be, >> but is far from a "Expert on Energy" > > So if this is the case, how come she couldn't name Exxon vs. Baker as > a Supreme Court case? > > I guess I just find it extremely odd. > > It happened just 4 months ago and seems to have been a big deal in > Alaska, Palin publicly commented on it, and it's definitely in her > "expertise" area, energy. > > I mean why wouldn't she simply repeat what she'd said 4 months ago? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:272001 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
