> RoMunn wrote: > As I noted before, I wanted McCain in 2000, not Bush. >
But you voted for Bush and have supported him ever since. That having been said, kudos to you for admitting your decade of poor judgment. I only wish you'd turn recognition into action. Nevertheless, you and I are an interesting pair. If we eliminate the positions and focus on principles, you and I probably agree 100% or as near to it as you can get. Even on foreign policy, although I think Iraq has distorted things. So how can we come to vastly different conclusions on leadership? Well, I dunno. I speculate that it has to do with how we judge people and what and how we're willing to compromise. For example, in 2000 I didn't vote for Bush solely because I thought he was an idiot and, in my experience, if you hire idiots you get idiotic results. In 2004, despite my suprise, I thought Bush was even stupider. Again, no matter the policy positions, I won't hire morons. As for this time it's not the dumb guy vs. the smart guy, it's the hothead shoot-from-the-arthritic-hip guy vs. the smart guy. So, net-net, I will vote against McCain because he's an admitted economic neophyte and hothead. That's the exact opposite of the personality-type we need as President right now. The only way I'd vote for him is if the other person was dumber and, of course, that's far from the case this time. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:272224 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
