Ignored it? So you mean there was no initiative to change things? To fix things? I seem to remember posts here about an initiative he pushed that was blocked...by Democrats. But the point is, I don't think he ignored it and I do think it was he rejected anyone's advice. And I never said he wasn't responsible, I said (again and again) that he wasn't SOLELY responsible.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uhh... > > In this instance you are talking about the entire economy of the > 'Company' you govern. > > If you were to say that you did not know about the financial affairs > of that company, and you left it totally up to everyone else, then yes > you are still to blame. > > Bush was warned. > He had information about what was happening on wall street, about the > greed and the corruption. > > Other heads of state warned him. > He ignored or rejected their advice. > > Then the economy crashes. > > The greed, gluttony and corruption in America has now has a ripple > effect throughout the world. > > How can you say that he is not responsible? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:273371 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
