On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Gruss wrote: > WRONG! She is within her rights to "remove" him (not fire), and not > for any reason.
So she can shoot him? Isn't that what government-speak for "remove" means? > She was found specifically in violation of Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) > of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act. > > She was found to have broken state law through an abuse of power by > using her office to benefit personally. She didn't benefit personally. Furthermore, the reason no charges were recommended in this case is that the Supreme Court, if asked, would slap down these idiots for trying to abridge the Constitutional power of the office of Governor. In other words, they can moan and cry all they want, but there is no there there. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:273509 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
