"Bankers" are not making $700 billion, and it is shameful and disgusting of you to say that when the stakes for the world economy are so high. Your motto is anything to win, even if it means throwing a couple of billion people into starvation when the world economy crashes, right?
Buying non-voting shares in banks is an investment that taxpayers can breathe easy about. That $250 billion should come back with interest. We have to wait and see how the rest of the money is invested in the economy. Buying securities is riskier than investing in the banks, but those assets could still mature and turn into profits, just like the Resolution Trust assets did. And how fitting it is that liberals would blame the government for attempting to rescue the economy and make a little money in the process. On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Gruss wrote: > RoMunn wrote: > > Obama's "tax" plan represents the biggest welfare plan in history. > > > > Assuming your representation is correct, how does it compare with $700 > billion to bankers within 1 year? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:274627 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
