> > It is undemocratic and horrible, but don't take my word for it, here is > Democratic hero and working class champion George McGovern talking about it:
He said he opposes the change to the organizing rules. He did not call Union organizers "thugs" which is what I took you to task for. That was stupid and you come off like an unthinking asshole with no sense of history or moral justice. Should I call all managers thugs because some of them aren't very nice people and make things unpleasant for those the work under them? In other words, separate your criticism of a propose law from your childish name calling. > The crux of the problem was that she didn't know she was >> being discriminated against until after the (absurdly low) statute of >> limitations had passed (6 months as I recall). How was she supposed to >> know? Do you expect her to just go around asking "Hey, are you >> breaking any laws I should know about?" >> > > Sounds like a reason to lengthen the statute of limitations, not undo it > completely. And this is the level of intellectual discourse I would expect from someone that read a WSJ Op-Ed "fact box" and parroted it without any further inquisition. The case was about seeking redress of grievances once they were known. If you are lied to for years, how are you supposed to establish a useful statute of limitations based on the commission of the act? Jesus Robert, this was a low weekend for you. Judah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:275410 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
