On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wiki :)
>
> It's based on liberation theology from South America.
> The idea being eliminating class struggle through fighting rather than
> education.

Being the smart little critter that I am, I read the Wikipedia article
before I asked you why you thought it was Marxist. I saw some people
listed in there who think it is Marxist, but bulk of the description
didn't seem to be terribly Marxist in nature.

I also didn't see anything in the main wikipedia article linking it to
anything in South America.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_liberation_theology

There is another page on Black Theology:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_theology

That one links it to South Africa. But not South America. Not sure why
linking it to either South Africa or South America would make it
Marxist anyway.

On preview: Wright said there were parrallels with Nicarauga
liberation theology, which is fine, but doesn't make the black
liberation theology Marxist at all.  Black liberation theology may be
Marxist, I don't know, but it pre-dates the Nicaraugan revolution.

All I'm seeing here is smears by association.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:275862
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to