Joe Klien wasn't being honest with his question. It's as if he was working for the Obama campaign. He stated about negotiations with Iran that Obama never mentioned Ahmadinejad directly by name. The fact is he did several times.
So what questions did the reporters ask Obama? On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For example, Robert's outrage at a perceived free speech violation. > This would appear to be a principled argument but, in fact, it's not. > We know this because we we've watched Pres Bush shred the Constitution > for the last 8 years and we've watched Robert defend every slice. So > when he shows outrage over some perceived speech violation by the > other candidate, it's position vs. principle. > > The goal of revealing people position - when they're couching it in > principle - is to show the false logic of accusation and thus to > discredit it. > > But many people don't understand these distinctions and thus think > it's justification; it's not. > > The questions are in the following order: > > 1.) What's the principle? > > 2.) What's the deviation from the principle? i.e., how bad is the violation? > > 3.) What's the motivation of the accuser? To defend the principle or > to cast dispersions on someone else over fake principle. > > 99.9% of the time, for example, Robert is simply using mock-principle > to cast dispersions. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:277702 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
