> > that sort of argument is just plain stupid. Reducing an argument to > its absurb extreme(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum), > insults not only the rest of us but yourself as well. > > Larry, I have one word for you to refute the concept that my argument > is absurd - NAMBLA
Pure and utter bullsh*t. That's like saying because we let straights get married, they'll allow 12 year old girls to marry. Sorry I forgot about the Rev. Tony Alamo http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/10/22/childporn.alamo.search.ap/index.html?iref=mpstoryview Mind you I'm not even going to mention the deep south, like Arkansas or Alabama. The point is that your so-called NAMBLA argument is so absurd that its barely even worth ridiculing in return. To call it stupid it to credit some intelligence behind that argument. In those places that allow gay marriage, there has been no uptick of sexual abuse of boys. Yet in places that specifically forbid gay marriage there has been an increase in the sexual abuse of young girls by adult males. What does that say about forbidding gay marriage? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:278858 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
