Actually my point is that it doesn't necessarily *matter* from an evolutionary perspective if they can reproduce. Having a kid is important in terms of heredity, but it isn't the end-all be-all of evolution.
Now you can argue that marriage has a benefit from a social perspective and how heterosexual coupling society, blah blah blah. That's fine but it is different than the biological argument. Biologically, homosexuality is not abnormal and it is not necessarily evolutionarily maladaptive. Judah On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Michael Grant [Modus I.S.] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Deviates slightly from the point I was making which is that biologically > human homosexuals can't reproduce. But very insightful nonetheless. > > So to summarize you can have a gay marriage as long as your sister has kids > or you're a termite. > > Good news is I've never put as much thought into my opinion on gay marriage > as I have since posting. Still not sure where I stand on what's right and > what's wrong, but at least the wheels are spinning. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280772 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
