I think you'll find historically benefits were extended for exactly that purpose. To encourage growth of nations. Perhaps not applicable in this day and age where anything goes sexually. Perhaps rather than extending marriage benefits to gays we should just remove them all together, since the idea of marriage is getting distorted anyway. Then you can go ahead and marry whatever your sexual taste is. Man, woman, donkey or xbox.
-----Original Message----- From: David Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:28 AM To: cf-community Subject: RE: the list Yep. Which means that marriage benefits have nothing to do with raising children or the ease thereof as you pointed out before. Game, set, match! Good job :) David Churvis -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:29 PM To: cf-community Subject: RE: the list > -----Original Message----- > From: David Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:59 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: RE: the list > > What about gay couples who adopt children? > > David Churvis They get the exact same "tax breaks" that are being argued as a benefit of marriage. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280862 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
