I find it fascinating that I've yet to see a discussion of gay marriage that did not end up with a supporter of "traditional" marriage bringing up beastiality.
Make of it what you will. On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Michael Grant [Modus IS] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you'll find historically benefits were extended for exactly that > purpose. To encourage growth of nations. Perhaps not applicable in this day > and age where anything goes sexually. Perhaps rather than extending marriage > benefits to gays we should just remove them all together, since the idea of > marriage is getting distorted anyway. Then you can go ahead and marry > whatever your sexual taste is. Man, woman, donkey or xbox. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280863 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
