> RoMunn wrote: > air. One can reasonably assume that found ballots would hold some votes for > Coleman and some votes for Franken. >
::sigh:: I'm trying not to say something like: If "one" was a funcking moron "one" assumes a lot of stupid shit. But I won't. I think Judah has summarized it nicely and as MN resident who's followed it very closely and who's heard read the committee reports on a daily basis I can say I'm more than happy with their professionalism in a tough situation. Despite the fact that educating you won't matter since your opinions always seem quite distant from factual analysis, I'll make the point that this is a recount. What does that mean? It means that ballots have been previously counted. Why does that matter? Because when the ballots were previously counted they were sorted. There's all kinds of sorting methodologies, but one popular one with elections is by who the voter voted for. In other words, is it surprising that 100 votes for Franken were found in a pile? Not unless you're a moron. oops, sorry. No, it's not surprising at all. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:282938 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
