Depends on the level, this guy maybe not. But it still tells us he didn't know what he was talking about.
I would like to think he read the speech, and then went over to the speech write and said "You sure these were both a result of this act?" I just tells me he didn't follow up. It also tells me the elected official is just a figurehead, and just spouts words written by a speech writer who could put anything in there he wanted too. So the question is, which is worse, a guy who doesn't know what he talking about, or a guy who is just talking because that is what is on the paper. At 04:58 PM 4/15/2002 -0400, you wrote: >More likely a speech writer who didn't check the facts. You don't really >think these politicians write this stuff, do you? > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:37 PM > >To: CF-Community > >Subject: Fun and Useless news > > > >Not to start a flamewar but... > > > >http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=106&ncid=742&e=4&u=/nypo > >st/20020415/cm_nypost/tom_daschle_s_weird_history > > > >Watch for url wrap. > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
