What are you doing with the scans afterwards? do they have to be "perfect" ?
I was thinking you could scan it in pieces. And "stitch" it back together in Photoshop. I imagine you could get it pretty close to perfect.... Otherwise - why dont you get him smaller paper. :) By the way - excellent painting. If he's that delicate with watercolors - highly encourage it. Very hard medium to work in, despite the term "water". One would think oils would be harder, but you can't make mistakes with watercolors and get away with it. On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Ian Skinner <[email protected]> wrote: > What I like from the scans is that you get a sense of > the paper not just the image. > > http://www.ilsweb.com/Family/Christopher/displayArt.cfm?piece=christopherArt/Vase > [Warning art work by 6 year old]. > > How hard do you think it would be to get the same affect with a photo? > I presume I would have to be fairly particular with lighting, camera > position, exposer, etc to get the same thing. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:283999 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
