On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > No they rejected it, but I won't argue facts since they don't matter for you.
The justices said the campaign's claim of double-counted ballots is better resolved in a court hearing where evidence can be presented, instead of by canvassing boards. > You should take on Nate Silver though, as I'm sure he'd be amused. > Here's his original post: > > http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/did-wall-street-jorunal-fire-their-fact.html So you post garbage you can't defend? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:284066 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
