All the Myspace pages load as CFM pages with a Fusebox fuseaction in the url. Not sure what's happening behind the scenes. I would severely question any stats that show a 500% reduction in resources. I've found ASP.NET do be much more of a resource hog than CF. Did you post this question on CF-TALK?
Watch your inbox. I'm sending more stuff to you offlist. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Joel Polsky <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this TRUE?? > > Look at the bottom, foot note #1 on this page; > http://www.spoiledtechie.com/?tag=/asp.net+vs+coldfusion > > "MySpace.com runs completely on ASP.NET and has now for two years - Confirmed > by Scott Guthrie after chatting with him for a few minutes, MySpace still has > the CFM tags, but they made the switch over to ASP.NET 2 years ago. Scott > told me to email him about a case study they did on the MySpace switch over > so I did and will post that valuable information on my blog once I get it. > For a Stat, MySpace saw a 500% reduction of server resources when they > switched over from ColdFusion to ASP.NET. I was happy to hear that because > its hard to find any facts on ColdFusion v.s. ASP.NET. This stat is comes > from Scott Guthrie." > > Anyone have stats on going from ASP.NET TO CF? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:284301 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
