I can get a 500% resource reduction by recoding, especially if the original
code sucked to the point of crashing on a regular basis. Look up the reports
on the Myspace changeover to BlueDragon from CFUnited a few years back.
Add in the savings for new servers, routers, DB boxes, better DB structures,
etc. The case study must include these things or else it's selling you a
line. Going from bad code, bad distribution, bad DBs, bad, bad, bad, over to
mediocre or even good will show these savings and even more.

But this shows a truth that many wanted to ignore - Bluedragon was not
looking to support ColdFusion but was instead looking to be a portal from
ColdFusion to .Net.

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Joel Polsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is this TRUE??
>
> Look at the bottom, foot note #1 on this page;
> http://www.spoiledtechie.com/?tag=/asp.net+vs+coldfusion
>
> "MySpace.com runs completely on ASP.NET and has now for two years -
> Confirmed by Scott Guthrie after chatting with him for a few minutes,
> MySpace still has the CFM tags, but they made the switch over to ASP.NET 2
> years ago. Scott told me to email him about a case study they did on the
> MySpace switch over so I did and will post that valuable information on my
> blog once I get it.  For a Stat, MySpace saw a 500% reduction of server
> resources when they switched over from ColdFusion to ASP.NET.  I was happy
> to hear that because its hard to find any facts on ColdFusion v.s. ASP.NET.
> This stat is comes from Scott Guthrie."
>
> Anyone have stats on going from ASP.NET TO CF?
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:284302
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to