You're missing my point. If there were no borders, there would be no countries, just one big planet. There would be no ownership, so the territorial battles like Indian and Pakistan fighting over Kashmir would not exist. There would be no North and South Korea. Imagine.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Michael Dinowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > The the border between North and South Korea is not preventing a war? The > border between India and Pakastan is not preventing a war? > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Again, you're claiming the line prevents war. I don't believe it. >> Borders are all about ownership, and if you have no opposing claims, >> then why is there a reason to fight? I suppose someone would fight >> just for sake of fighting - some alpha male marking his territory - >> but it only becomes war when those who have claimed control sanction >> it as such, and those who have ceded control to them allow it to >> continue. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:286248 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
