Actually, don't blame Scott for that analogy, it was me. And why do we need an immediate stimulus passed in the next 15 days for projects that don't have any return for a decade or decades.
Why can we not take a more deliberative approach for that long term spending, and handle it as "normal" spending? What is the rush? Seems like the used car dealer trying to get the young couple to sign the loan quickly, without letting them read all the fiddly details. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Scott wrote: > >> This is CPR at an accident scene, not long term health care. > >> > > That's totally false. > > 1.) The EMT turned over the patient last year and the stimulus *is* > the doctor for the future - it's the federal gov't. > > 2.) The patient has already been stabilized, which was the heading off > economic systemic collapse in Oct 2008. > > 3.) Any medical procedures done today should have a line-of-sight to > the long term health of the patient. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:287377 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
