What's more "high horse": to advocate for something you can't define and don't understand or to question someone who is?
There's nothing high horse about it. Why does one need to define to advocate it? I've seen it in practice. I've seen it working. How ridiculous is it to be skeptical of something that you can see working? Gruss: It's really dark in here. Mike: Try using a flashlight. Gruss: How are they made, what's the process? Mike: I dunno. But you can see in the dark. I have one here, check it out. Gruss: No way Jose. I refuse to use it until you can explain every aspect of it. Mike: Ok, fine. Sit in the dark. On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Michael wrote: > > Get off your high horse Gruss. > > ::cough, cough:: > > Ahem. I'd prefer to not compare sizes of our horses. > > I'll pose a question for you though: > > What's more "high horse": to advocate for something you can't define > and don't understand or to question someone who is? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:288883 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
