> Grant wrote: > You act like nationlised health care is some untested conceptual idea. It's > been in practice successfully. It's tangable Gruss. >
1.) You don't even know what you're talking about when you say "nationalized health care". You don't understand how it works, who the constituents are, or what the tradeoffs are. So we can just make up words and say they work, but that's not very useful without specific definitions. 2.) They don't operate in a vacuum, they take advantage of the USA's massive healthcare spending and infrastructure. Prove to me they're not parasitic. Look, I want everyone to have awesome affordable high quality healthcare. And if there's a role in the US for the government, I'm all for it. But the thing is, I don't understand it nor have a clue what the answer might be. And I'm a skeptic. So when I hear people who know less than me swearing by a solution they can't even define ... Well, I'm not convinced. But I'm not saying you're wrong either. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:288868 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
