> RoMunn wrote: > > As I noted before the election, Obama seems far more likely to be another > Carter than another Bush. >
Course you voted for Bush twice and thought he was going to be one of the greatest presidents so ... But seriously. Think about that statement: "more likely" Based on what? You bullshit. For once, make a change Robert. Let the facts drive your views not your politics drive the facts. Now for my genius presidential analysis. Great presidents typically have 2 big things under their name: a war completed and infrastructure built. 1.) Lincoln: civil war & land grant colleges 2.) FDR: WWII & massive infrastructure 3.) Ike: Korean war & the freeway system. Obama is talented and he's got the opportunity (due to Bush's massive fuck-ups). Does he have the right talent to end a war and create some lasting infrastructure? I don't know. But if he does he'll join the list of the Greatest US presidents. If he fails, then he fails. Which is more "likely"? Who can reasonably say? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:289425 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
